These are submissions sent to SITF by centers or exhibitors. They are labeled by the name they came with initially. When their identity is confirmed, the last line on the page will have those results.
Sometimes on the page or in additional information areas we will post reference material pertinent to the submission.
You may comment but ask that comments be about the identity of the plant or references.
Comments
Anyone may comment but ask that comments be about the identity of the plant or references. Comments that are not pertinent will be deleted by the administrator.
If you have questions or comments you don’t want to post you can contact members of SITF, use sitf@aos.org
Submissions, useawardid@aos.org ........for instructions on submissions see below under labels: instructions for submissions to SITF
May 04, 2011
Coelogyne suragenense determined to be Coelogyne vanoverberghii
award number 20114458 as Coel.suragenense. Kew or the internet has nothing on this speices name Michael MacConaill
Coelogyne suragenense, award number 20114458,
has been determined to be Coelogyne vanoverberghii by SITF (May
2014).
1 comment:
Anonymous
said...
There is no valid nomenclatural combination of "Coelogyne suragenense." The plant shown is likely an undescribed species from Mindanao (Philippines), that has been known for many years under other provisional and unpublished names. There are a number of color variants being cloned by division, which go under other unpublished Latinized binomials, including a pale variant marketed under the name "C. salverianum." A classic case of horticultural commercialism abusing scientific validity.
1 comment:
There is no valid nomenclatural combination of "Coelogyne suragenense." The plant shown is likely an undescribed species from Mindanao (Philippines), that has been known for many years under other provisional and unpublished names. There are a number of color variants being cloned by division, which go under other unpublished Latinized binomials, including a pale variant marketed under the name "C. salverianum." A classic case of horticultural commercialism abusing scientific validity.
Post a Comment