These are submissions sent to SITF by centers or exhibitors. They are labeled by the name they came with initially. When their identity is confirmed, the last line on the page will have those results. Sometimes on the page or in additional information areas we will post reference material pertinent to the submission. You may comment but ask that comments be about the identity of the plant or references.
Comments
Anyone may comment but ask that comments be about the identity of the plant or references. Comments that are not pertinent will be deleted by the administrator.
If you have questions or comments you don’t want to post you can contact members of SITF, use sitf@aos.org
Submissions, use awardid@aos.org ........for instructions on submissions see below under labels: instructions for submissions to SITF
If you have questions or comments you don’t want to post you can contact members of SITF, use sitf@aos.org
Submissions, use awardid@aos.org ........for instructions on submissions see below under labels: instructions for submissions to SITF
June 29, 2009
Gongora nigropunctata (pardina) determined to be Gongora latibasis
Award Description:
60 flowers and 54 buds on 8 inflorescences arranged spirally on pendent up to 45 cm long stems; flowers cream almost solidly overlaid with chestnut brown dots and flushes, dorsal and petals fused to column for half their length with the petals narrow and with free tips curved downward and then back towards column; lateral sepals folded back partially to wholly meeting like a butterfly's wings; lip boat shaped with hypochile with a bent down small tooth on each side near base, slit on bottom narrow and only slightly wider near base, mesochile a narrow hump and 2 thread-like horns held perpendicular to plane of rest of lip, epichile tightly folded, tip curved up, substance fairly heavy, texture matte on sepals and petals and shiny on lip.
Gongora nigropunctata, award 20095021 has been determined to be Gongora latibasis by SITF, July 2009, with assistance of Rudolf Jenny. There are previous CHMs to this species. Often this species is green gray with no particular color, but there is a previous award that says the red is cinnamon red. You could argue that your CHM has more red than cinnamon and if you determine that is the case make sure you state that is clone is different than previous awards so that the award will not be nullified.
Patricia Harding, chair SITF.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment